Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11889/8049
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGhandour, Rulaen_US
dc.contributor.authorShoaibi, Azzaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKhatib, Ranaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAbu Rmeileh, Niveenen_US
dc.contributor.authorUnal, Belginen_US
dc.contributor.authorSozmen, Kaanen_US
dc.contributor.authorKılıc, Bulenten_US
dc.contributor.authorFouad, Fouaden_US
dc.contributor.authorAl Ali, Radwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorBen Romdhane, Habibaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAissi, Wafaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAhmad, Balsamen_US
dc.contributor.authorCapewell, Simonen_US
dc.contributor.authorCritchley, Juliaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHusseini, Abdullatifen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-23T07:58:30Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-23T07:58:30Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11889/8049-
dc.description.abstractTo explore the feasibility of using a simple multi-criteria decision analysis method with policy makers/ key stakeholders to prioritize cardiovascular disease (CVD) policies in four Mediterranean countries: Palestine, Syria, Tunisia and Turkey. Methods A simple multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method was piloted. A mixed methods study was used to identify a preliminary list of policy options in each country. These policies were rated by different policymakers/ stakeholders against pre-identified criteria to generate a priority score for each policy and then rank the policies. Results Twenty-five different policies were rated in the four countries to create a country-specific list of CVD prevention and control policies. The response rate was 100 % in each country. The top policies were mostly population level interventions and health systems’ level policies. Conclusions Successful collaboration between policy makers/stakeholders and researchers was established in this small pilot study. MCDA appeared to be feasible and effective. Future applications should aim to engage a larger, representative sample of policy makers, especially from outside the health sector. Weighting the selected criteria might also be assessed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInt J Public Healthen_US
dc.subjectMultiple criteria decision makingen_US
dc.subjectPriority settingen_US
dc.subjectDecision making processen_US
dc.subjectLow middle income countriesen_US
dc.subjectCardiovascular system - Diseasesen_US
dc.titlePriority setting for the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases: multi-criteria decision analysis in four eastern Mediterranean countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
newfileds.departmentInstitute of Community and Public Healthen_US
newfileds.item-access-typeopen_accessen_US
newfileds.thesis-prognoneen_US
newfileds.general-subjectnoneen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1other-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Fulltext Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

8
checked on Feb 6, 2024

Download(s)

3
checked on Feb 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.