Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11889/2648
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hamad, Ahmad Azem | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-10-15T08:53:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-10-15T08:53:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11889/2648 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article argues that there has been increasing inaccuracy in defining the concept of “conflict management”. The term has been given a far narrower meaning than it deserves. Historically, it has been understood to mean the containment or suspension of a conflict. The linguistic and conceptual meanings of “management” in disciplines such as “business management” are much wider than the conventional meaning of the term in conflict studies. Conflict management covers every action taken by the parties to the conflict to handle the situation. Therefore, the definition of the term should be extended to cover a whole discipline, which includes the initiation of a conflict, its escalation, the ensuing complications, containment, resolution and transformation as sub-topics. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Bradford | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Conflict management | |
dc.title | The reconceptualisation of conflict management | en_US |
newfileds.item-access-type | open_access | en_US |
newfileds.general-subject | Political Science and International Relations | en_US |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | other | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
Appears in Collections: | Fulltext Publications |
Page view(s)
613
Last Week
1
1
Last month
6
6
checked on Apr 14, 2024
Download(s)
555
checked on Apr 14, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.