Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11889/4628
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZimmo, Omar
dc.contributor.authorAl-Sa'ed, Rashed
dc.contributor.authorSteen, Peter van der
dc.contributor.authorGijzen, Huub
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-21T12:50:30Z
dc.date.available2017-03-21T12:50:30Z
dc.date.issued2002-01
dc.identifier.citationWater Sci. Tech. 45(1), 91-101.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://wst.iwaponline.com/content/45/1/91
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11889/4628
dc.description.abstractA pilot plant experiment was carried out to assess differences in environmental conditions and treatment performance in two systems for wastewater treatment: algae-based ponds (ABP) and duckweed-based (Lemna gibba) ponds (DBP). Each system consisted of a sequence of 4 equal ponds in series and was fed with a constant flow rate of partially treated wastewater from Birzeit University. Physico-chemical parameters and the removal of organic matter, nutrients and faecal coliforms were monitored within each treatment system over a period of 12 months. The results show clear differences in the environmental conditions. In ABP significantly (P>0.05) higher pH and DO values were observed than in DBP. DBP were more efficient in removal of organic matter (BOD and TSS) than ABP. The faecal coliform reduction was higher in ABP. However, the quality of the effluent from the third and fourth duckweed pond (total retention time of 21 and 28 days) did not exceed the WHO-criteria for unrestricted irrigation during both the summer and winter period, respectively. During the summer period, the average total nitrogen was reduced more in ABP (80%) than in DBP (55%). Lower values were measured during the winter period. Seasonal nitrogen reductions of the two systems were significantly different (P>0.05). In DBP, 33% and 15% of the total nitrogen was recovered into plant biomass and removed from the system via duckweed harvesting during the summer and winter period, respectively. This study showed that there were differences in the environmental conditions and treatment efficiencies between the two systems.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIWA Publishing, Londonen_US
dc.subjectGroundwater - Pollutionen_US
dc.subjectDenitrificationen_US
dc.subjectWater - Purificationen_US
dc.subjectFaecal Coliformen_US
dc.subjectSewage lagoonsen_US
dc.subjectSewage - Purification - Activated sludge processen_US
dc.titleProcess performance assessment of algae-based and duckweed-based wastewater treatment systems.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
newfileds.departmentInstitute of Environmental and Water Studiesen_US
newfileds.item-access-typeopen_accessen_US
newfileds.thesis-prognoneen_US
newfileds.general-subjectEngineering and Technology | الهندسة والتكنولوجياen_US
Appears in Collections:Institute of Environmental and Water Studies

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zimmo et al. (2002) WatSciTech45(1)2002.pdfmain article180.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.