Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11889/7900
Title: Talking to a (Segregation) Wall: Intergroup Contact and Attitudes Toward Normalization Among Palestinians From the Occupied Territories
Authors: Albzour, Mai 
Bady, Zacharia 
Elcheroth, Guy 
Penic, Sandra 
Reimer, Nils 
Green, Eva G. T. 
Keywords: Intergroup relations;Interpersonal relations;Sedative effect;Negative attitudes;Israeli West Bank Barrier - Psychological aspects;Israel-Arab conflict - Psychological aspects
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Political Psychology
Abstract: This article examines how Palestinians’ intergroup contact experiences relate to their attitudes towards interactions with Israelis (i.e., normalization). We draw on four recent advances in intergroup contact literature. First, recent research indicates that positive contact can impede disadvantaged groups’ motivation to challenge inequalities. Second, increased endorsement of normalization mediates this sedative effect of positive contact on motivation to resist in the West Bank. Third, negative contact has been related to increased motivation for social change. Fourth, institutions and societal norms shape the meaning of intergroup contact and its effect on intergroup relations. We hypothesize that negative experiences at checkpoints can act as reminders of institutionalized inequalities and thus attenuate sedative effects. Furthermore, we explore the contextual boundary conditions of such reminder effects. Analyses of cross-sectional survey conducted among a representative sample (N = 1,000) in the West Bank including Jerusalem showed that (1) positive intergroup contact related to normalization endorsement (sedative effect), (2) negative intergroup contact related to decreased normalization endorsement (mobilizing effect), and (3) negative contact experiences (at checkpoints) canceled out the effect of positive contact (reminder effect), but only in Jerusalem. Results suggest that the impacts of intergroup contact need to be interpreted in light of institutionalized forms of group inequality and segregation.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11889/7900
DOI: 10.1177/00219347211047877
Appears in Collections:Fulltext Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

39
checked on Jun 27, 2024

Download(s)

164
checked on Jun 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.