Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11889/6911
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBadawi, Ahmeden_US
dc.contributor.authorYusoff, Siti Hajaren_US
dc.contributor.authorZyoud, Alharethen_US
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Sherozen_US
dc.contributor.authorHashim, Aishaen_US
dc.contributor.authorUyaroğlu, Yılmazen_US
dc.contributor.authorIsmail, Mahmouden_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-16T06:10:08Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-16T06:10:08Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11889/6911-
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to determine the potential of wind energy in the mediterranean coastal plain of Palestine. The parameters of the Weibull distribution were calculated on basis of wind speed data. Accordingly, two approaches were employed: analysis of a set of actual time series data and theoretical Weibull probability function. In this analysis, the parameters Weibull shape factor ‘k’ and the Weibull scale factor ‘c’ were adopted. These suitability values were calculated using the following popular methods: method of moments (MM), standard deviation method (STDM), empirical method (EM), maximum likelihood method (MLM), modified maximum likelihood method (MMLM), second modified maximum likelihood method (SMMLM), graphical method (GM), least mean square method (LSM) and energy pattern factor method (EPF). The performance of these numerical methods was tested by root mean square error (RMSE), index of agreement (IA), Chi-square test (X2 ), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and relative root mean square error (RRMSE) to estimate the percentage of error. Among the prediction techniques. The EPF exhibited the greatest accuracy performance followed by MM and MLM, whereas the SMMLM exhibited the worst performance. The RMSE achieved the best prediction accuracy, whereas the RRMSE attained the worst prediction accuracyen_US
dc.publisherinstitute of advanced engineering and scienceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems (IJPEDS)en_US
dc.subjectWinds - Speed - Measurementen_US
dc.subjectAverage wind speeden_US
dc.subjectWind poweren_US
dc.subjectCumulative distributionen_US
dc.subjectProbability distribution functionen_US
dc.subjectNumerical analysisen_US
dc.subjectStatistical toolsen_US
dc.subjectWeibull distributionen_US
dc.subjectParameter estimation.en_US
dc.subjectWind energyen_US
dc.titleData bank: nine numerical methods for determining the parameters of weibull for wind energy generation tested by five statistical toolsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
newfileds.departmentEngineering and Technologyen_US
newfileds.item-access-typeopen_accessen_US
newfileds.thesis-prognoneen_US
newfileds.general-subjectnoneen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.11591/ijpeds.v12.i2.pp1114-1130-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Fulltext Publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
document.pdf1.32 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

211
checked on Apr 14, 2024

Download(s)

172
checked on Apr 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.