Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11889/6346
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBahdi, Reemen_US
dc.contributor.authorKassis, Mudaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-19T18:10:04Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-19T18:10:04Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11889/6346-
dc.descriptionA chapter from abook titled : Transitional Justice in Comparative Perspective, p. 185-215en_US
dc.description.abstractUsing Palestine as its case study, this chapter posits that judicial trustworthiness represents an important condition for transitional justice to take hold and that judicial education can nurture judicial trustworthiness. Judicial education thus constitutes an ameliorating factor of the type outlined by El-Masri, Lambert and Quinn in the introduction to this volume. We begin by briefly distinguishing among trust, distrust and trustworthiness and explain the importance of judicial institutional trustworthiness. We then turn to judicial education as an ameliorating factor. Laying out the elements of a judicial education model designed around the concept of human dignity that we developed in the Palestinian context, we explain why this model of judicial education was particularly suited to nurturing judicial institutional trustworthiness. Our analysis draws on our own experiences developing and delivering judicial education programming focused on human dignity in Palestine between 2005 and 2012; 26 interviews with Palestinian judges who participated in our judicial education programme, and interdisciplinary scholarship from pedagogy, access to justice, trust/distrust/trustworthiness and transitional justice. Although we argue that judicial education can nurture judicial trustworthiness, we end with a note of caution. The Palestinian experience reinforces that judicial education can ameliorate efforts to nurture trustworthy national courts, but, contrary to the assumptions that are often made by development experts, education is necessary but not sufficient to foster institutional or political change. Ultimately, the Palestinian experience points to the inadequacies of pursuing rule of law programming, judicial reform and judicial education in the absence of transitional justice.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillanen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectJudges - Education - Palestineen_US
dc.subjectTransitional justice - Palestineen_US
dc.subjectInstitutional trustworthinessen_US
dc.titleInstitutional trustworthiness, Transformative judicial education and transitional justice : a Palestinian experienceen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
dcterms.formatpdfen_US
newfileds.departmentMuwatin Institute for Democracy and Human Rightsen_US
newfileds.item-access-typearchiveen_US
newfileds.thesis-prognoneen_US
newfileds.general-subjectSocial Sciences | العلوم الإنسانيةen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-34917-2_8-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1other-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Fulltext Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

39
checked on Jun 22, 2021

Download(s)

21
checked on Jun 22, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.