Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11889/4531
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sayyad, Abdel Salam | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ingram, Joseph | - |
dc.contributor.author | Menzies, Tim | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ammar, Hany | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-03-16T07:11:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-03-16T07:11:27Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11889/4531 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In Search-Based Software Engineering, well-known metaheuristic search algorithms are utilized to find solutions to common software engineering problems. The algorithms are usually taken “off the shelf” and applied with trust, i.e. software engineers are not concerned with the inner workings of algorithms, only with the results. While this may be sufficient is some domains, we argue against this approach, particularly where the complexity of the models and the variety of user preferences pose greater challenges to the metaheuristic search algorithms. We build on our previous investigation which uncovered the power of Indicator-Based Evolutionary Algorithm (IBEA) over traditionally-used algorithms (such as NSGA-II), and in this work we scrutinize the time behavior of user objectives subject to optimization. This analysis brings out the business perspective, previously veiled under Pareto-collective gauges such as Hypervolume and Spread. In addition, we show how slowing down the rates of crossover and mutation can help IBEA converge faster, as opposed to following the higher rates used in many other studies as “rules of thumb" | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Computer software - Development | en_US |
dc.subject | Software engineering | en_US |
dc.subject | Data mining | en_US |
dc.subject | Management information systems | en_US |
dc.subject | Mathematical optimization | en_US |
dc.subject | Evolutionary computation | en_US |
dc.subject | Software engineering | en_US |
dc.title | Optimum feature selection in software product lines: let your model and values guide your search | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
newfileds.department | Engineering and TechnologyEngineering and Technology | en_US |
newfileds.item-access-type | open_access | en_US |
newfileds.thesis-prog | none | en_US |
newfileds.general-subject | Computers and Information Technology | الحاسوب وتكنولوجيا المعلومات | en_US |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | other | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
Appears in Collections: | Fulltext Publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
10.1.1.297.4973.pdf | 1 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
146
Last Week
0
0
Last month
2
2
checked on Mar 25, 2024
Download(s)
65
checked on Mar 25, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.