Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11889/1982
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGhandour, Rula-
dc.contributor.authorShoaibi, Azza-
dc.contributor.authorKhatib, Rana-
dc.contributor.authorAbu-Rmeileh, Niveen-
dc.contributor.authorUnal, Belgin-
dc.contributor.authorSozmen, Kaan-
dc.contributor.authorKılıc, Bulent-
dc.contributor.authorFouad, Fouad-
dc.contributor.authorAl Ali, Radwan-
dc.contributor.authorRomdhane, Habiba Ben-
dc.contributor.authorAissi, Wafa-
dc.contributor.authorAhmad, Balsam-
dc.contributor.authorCapewell, Simon-
dc.contributor.authorCritchley, Julia-
dc.contributor.authorHusseini, Abdullatif-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-08T06:44:57Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-08T06:44:57Z-
dc.date.issued2014-5-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11889/1982-
dc.descriptionFouad,Fouad:American University of Beirut Radwan,Al Ali:Syrian Center for Tobacco Studies Aissi,Wafa:en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives To explore the feasibility of using a simple multi-criteria decision analysis method with policy makers/ key stakeholders to prioritize cardiovascular disease (CVD) policies in four Mediterranean countries: Palestine, Syria, Tunisia and Turkey. Methods A simple multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method was piloted. A mixed methods study was used to identify a preliminary list of policy options in each country. These policies were rated by different policymakers/stakeholders against pre-identified criteria to generate a priority score for each policy and then rank the policies. Results Twenty-five different policies were rated in the four countries to create a country-specific list of CVD prevention and control policies. The response rate was 100 % in each country. The top policies were mostly population level interventions and health systems’ level policies. Conclusions Successful collaboration between policy makers/stakeholders and researchers was established in this small pilot study. MCDA appeared to be feasible and effective. Future applications should aim to engage a larger, representative sample of policy makers, especially from outside the health sector. Weighting the selected criteria might also be assessed.-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherResearchGateen_US
dc.subject.lcshMultiple criteria decision making-
dc.subject.lcshCardiovascular system - Diseases - Prevention-
dc.titlePriority setting for the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases: multi-criteria decision analysis in four eastern Mediterranean countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
newfileds.departmentCommunity and Public Healthen_US
newfileds.item-access-typeopen_accessen_US
item.languageiso639-1other-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Fulltext Publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Ghandour et al 2014(1).pdf759 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

156
Last Week
0
Last month
3
checked on Apr 14, 2024

Download(s)

69
checked on Apr 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.